Everton 2 – 2 Arsenal: Match Thoughts And Individual Analysis

Often it’s difficult to judge if a team seems dominant because they’re playing well or due to the weaknesses of the opponent. But unless you can determine the dynamic that is driving the patterns on the pitch, any analytical process will return a flawed output at best.

I was expecting a low to average quality game between two sides that are yet to hit their stride and that’s what we saw. For most of the game, and particularly in the first half, it appeared that the hosts were playing well but they will really have to up their game if they want to have any realistic hopes of challenging for the Champions League spots.

Everton

Their attacks were mostly limited to long balls played down their left wing and that controversial counter-attack for the second goal. In total, we can count three very good attacks from Martinez’s side. Two resulted in goals and the third was a chance for Mirallas. Apart from that they created little in terms of quality chances even if there were a few threatening moments (Baines getting to the byline, Mertesacker slip letting Lukaku run at Chambers, etc.)

Their combination play was extremely limited and very little came down their right side. See the following comparison of their attacking third passes with the corresponding fixture from last season. Notice the density of the smaller lines that represent short passes which are an indication of combination play.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Their individual moments of quality were also limited. For instance, they had fewer dribbles or take-ons

Everton Takeons

Click to enlarge

They weren’t able to bring Lukaku, Naismith, or Coleman into the game as often as they did in April. The two strikers received about two-thirds of the passes they did in the previous game. Naismith was involved in a lot of short passing when the Toffees won but this time he seemed more a target for vertical balls in a limited role. He had almost no involvement on their right flank. Coleman rarely saw the ball in the attacking third in this game as against his very influential attacking contribution from the last one.

Lukaku Passes Rcvd

Click to enlarge

Naismith Passes Rcvd

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

The impact of this can be seen from the quantity and quality of chances they created. The Toffees managed a number of shots from central areas and inside the box when they won but in this game they created fewer chance and nothing of note except the three big ones mentioned above.

Everton Shots

They also completely faded away in the second half. It was similar to their drop in performance against Leicester. Comparison with last season’s game illustrates this further.

Everton 2n Halves Compared

Recall that we’d talked about controlling the ball as one of the key aspects of defending. 113 passes out of 158 is something one would expect from a mid-table side.

Arsenal

Wenger’s choices for the starting line-up were somewhat surprising. I understand that some fans have been hoping for more pace in the side, particularly with the inclusion of Oxlade-Chamberlain. Alexis as the central striker is also a choice many wanted to see.

It bombed.

In theory, the Gunners could have produced some very fluent football with six players capable of playing the pass-and-move game. In practice, Arsenal were rudderless and failed to create much, despite the opponents lacking some of their usual defensive qualities. Wenger’s side managed five shots in the first half. All were taken by Oxlade-Chamberlain. All were off target.

Sanchez was not on the same wavelength as his teammates, was often isolated, and never saw the ball in actually dangerous areas. It seemed like he was too mobile for his own and the team’s good.

Giroud’s arrival made a big difference. He became an excellent focal point for the team. But we must also note that Everton really dropped in quality in the second half. Giroud played most of the game there in April and wasn’t half as influential. So it wasn’t just about the Frenchman’s physical presence or other qualities, it was a combination of things, chief among which was the hosts’ poor performance. This culminated in absolutely abysmal defending for the goals, particularly the first one.

Goals

Arsenal were not really tested in defence, except for many balls played down their right flank. Chambers or Debuchy got around to dealing with most of these. But if you keep leaving that space open, sooner or later the opponent will capitalize.

Arsenal conceded their first goal from a well-worked set-piece. While the hosts deserve credit for the clever use of space and ball, it’s hard to keep track of the number of mistakes Wenger’s side made.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Arsenal have 7 players in the defensive line against 3 attackers. Even then Naismith is sort of free. Oxlade-Chamberlain is in a pointless position. Everton have two players free wide on the left and acres of space. AOC could easily have been near Osman with Ramsey a little higher and central. I don’t really understand what the thinking was here. Alexis is the sole guy chasing the ball. This is a classic example of what I’ve called “Crowd the centre” tactics from Arsenal. Get enough bodies in central areas in front of goal and it’ll be very hard for opponents to score.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Once Barry plays the ball wide, we see Debuchy and Oxlade-Chamberlain moving towards the right flank. They’re too late and have little chance of making a difference if Everton played quick passes (which they obviously did).

It’s interesting that Sanchez is in front of Barry but he is also caught ball watching and doesn’t notice the Englishman sneaking past him into the space on the edge of the box.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

The Gunners went deeper into the box when the ball went wide and then tried to push up when it was passed to the assist provider. Chambers was not able to push up in time but this probably would not have mattered because Coleman was anyway onside.

Özil made the obvious mistake of not tracking the run of the full-back. But I simply don’t see the point of giving one of your key attacking players such a role. If anyone in this team can be excused for not having enough defensive awareness, it’s Özil. Note that I’m not condoning the error, just saying that it was the most understandable one and should be avoided by altering the roles.

Szczesny was in a bad position because once again his first instinct was to go towards the ball.

Szczesny Goes To The Ball

The forward steps that he takes eat up valuable time. This meant he wasn’t in position or well balanced when the header was struck, and that in turn meant he was late in getting his arms up.

Szczesny Still Getting into position Arms used for balance Ball already on its way

The above snapshot was taken when the ball was already halfway towards him after the header by Coleman. Szczesny is still in the process of moving to his left and his arms are just trying to provide balance to that motion. By the time he gets that left foot down and tries to move his arms up it’s too late.

This was a header I’d expect a good goalkeeper to save. The Pole made a very similar mistake against Southampton last season when he conceded at the back post.

Counter-Attack

Everton’s second goal came from a brisk counter-attack. There is genuine reason to blame the referee for this one. Even if the foul on Mertesacker is considered debatable, there was no question about the off-side and the assistant was well placed to make the decision.

That said, there are a few aspects worth noting and areas where Arsenal will have to improve.

  • Lukaku did not track Monreal. Everton left him higher up the pitch (along with Naismith and Mirallas to an extent) and made sure they defend well with seven players. You don’t want to see your best attacking players forced to track back all the time. This is something Arsenal have to learn to do.
  • Chambers made a very rash decision to dive in. Had he stayed on his feet and slowed Lukaku by showing him out wide, the sprint back by Özil could have resulted in an extra body enough to limit the threat.
  • Flamini, the destroyer, wasn’t able to break play up. Far too many people simply assume a tough tackling player will prevent counter-attacks. It just doesn’t work that way.

Szczesny conceded through his legs. It was just awful. I remember a lot of such goals scored a decade or so ago when many one-v-one situations led to goals between the Keeper’s legs. It shouldn’t happen in the modern game.

The opponent should be forced to beat the goalkeeper over one of his legs. This is important because if the ball goes between the legs it’s guaranteed to go in goal. But if you tuck one knee in and close that gap, chances are the opponent will either hit your knee or can miss the target when going for the corners.

Again, Arsenal’s current first choice goalie has previous with such errors. It’s just very bad goalkeeping.

Ramsey’s Tap-in

Arsenal’s first goal came out of nothing. Everton had 7 players in and around the box but they just all went to sleep. No one went to close Cazorla down and Ramsey’s run wasn’t tracked. Osman, Baines, and Coleman could all have done better. Very poor defending.

Cazorla’s composure and accuracy of pass should be appreciated. Ramsey’s ability to keep going and his instincts in the attacking area are also worth commending.

Giroud’s Equalizer

When you have a big striker you expect him to score some really physical goals. Bully the defender and just knock the ball in. The Frenchman doesn’t do this often enough but in this case it was perfect execution. Monreal’s cross was well directed too. Nonetheless, any manager would be disappointed if his team conceded such a goal.

On the whole, I felt the hosts were well below their best all over the pitch. It’s also the reason this game seemed like one that Arsenal should have won. The title race is long and ruthless. There will be enough games that are really tough and a few where luck simply won’t go Arsenal’s way. This wasn’t one of them. Dropping points in such games, irrespective of what happened here last season or what will happen to other teams on this ground once the Toffees rediscover their mojo, is something the Gunners can ill-afford.

Based on his decisions this summer and thus far in the season, I have a feeling Wenger has taken a big gamble on the young British talent at his disposal. And if this game is anything to go by, Wilshere and AOC are a long way from deserving starting spots in an Arsenal side that wants to contend for the major titles. Both possess a fair amount of individual qualities and potential but lack the ability to make the right choices that’d make the whole team better.

Individual Performances:

Szczesny: Terrible (as discussed above).

Debuchy: A lot of attacks came down his flank and at times he was a little higher up the pitch than necessary. There were also times when he was caught in a situation where Mirallas was moving in while Baines was running down the flank without being tracked. The Frenchman made the right choices for the most part and that limited the number of chances that could be created from that flank. Didn’t get on the ball often enough for my liking and understanding with AOC or Sanchez could have been better.

Chambers: Had to cover behind Debuchy quite often and he did that well. Passing was quite composed. I really like the way he stayed with Lukaku when the striker ran across the face of the box after Mertesacker slipped and fell while trying a back pass. Bad choice to dive in as discussed above. Also has trouble with balls played behind him. For instance, when Naismith headed that ball in behind, the youngster turned 270 degrees from his right to face his own goal and chase instead of a simple 90 degrees to his left. That suggested he lost his bearings for a bit. In defence, that can be the difference between a clean tackle and a foul or even a goal.

Mertesacker: Had a tough time when isolated one-v-one but that happened rarely. Not sure if he was supposed to be organizing the team for the set-piece. There was less action on his side of the pitch.

Monreal: Was more involved on the ball than his teammate on the other flank but had significantly less work from a defensive point of view. I was surprised the hosts didn’t try to isolate his against Lukaku or Coleman. Good assist.

The defenders had a few tough moments to deal with and they did alright for the most part by limiting spaces to the wider areas and quickly covering for each other when the ball reached the final third. As a result the goal wasn’t exposed as often. The second goal should have been ruled out but the team needs to learn it’s lessons. Set-piece defending was again poor but it’s not just limited to the back four. The whole team and the coaching staff have to take responsibility.

Flamini: Passing was reliable but he should have been a lot more involved in ball circulation. That’s one of his major weaknesses. His tough tackling style wasn’t really useful as he made just two tackles. Five fouls, while not in the Chamakh category, is still a bit too much. As the deepest midfielder in the 4-1-4-1 of the first half, he wasn’t quite sure whether to stay with Naismith dropping deep or to cover the right side.

Ramsey: Tough game, wasn’t able to influence the attack or help with the defence nearly as much as he can. Came up with a big goal.

Wilshere: This was another game where he didn’t make any obvious mistakes but just couldn’t help make the team better. Needs much faster speed of thought if he has to play in the centre with a guy like Özil on the flank. Completed 1 of his 5 attempted take-ons. Will be much better if he starts using his passing array a lot more and limits the whole “driving at opponents” bit to a few carefully chosen moments.

Özil: Stuck on the left and just his first game of the season yet seemed like the best player on the pitch. Error for the goal aside, it’s hard to find any faults with his performance. Played a lovely through-ball for Wilshere, set-up AOC with a good cut-back, another chance for Chamberlain came when one of his through-balls for Monreal forced a panicky clearance from Coleman, and many other small moments of quality all over the pitch. Deserved better support and intelligence from his teammates.

Oxlade-Chamberlain: Somewhat wayward and wasteful with shooting. Ran into crowds quite often. Created a good chance for Giroud early in the second half. Was lax with tracking Baines. Disappointing performance on the whole.

Cazorla: Had only a few minutes on the pitch. I liked his professionalism and focus. Excellent weight on the pass for Ramsey.

The midfield was all over the place in the first half. The movement itself was decent but understanding and speed of passing was not up to scratch which constrained the quality of attacks they could build. Promising moments in the final third were squandered by poor choices or execution.

Defensive support was good. Covered the central areas well, except one or two cases.

Sanchez: Had only one touch in the opposition box. Wasn’t on the same wavelength as anyone else. Wenger talks about physical fitness but to me it seems more a case of role definition. He’s another player who’s trying too hard and needs to simplify things. Let others do bulk of the work and focus on getting into the vital attacking areas. I did enjoy the time he tracked Mirallas all the way back to prevent a counter-attack after losing the ball through a bad touch.

Giroud: Looked hungry and got into very good areas. On another day he could have scored more. That goal against City and this one show the kind of qualities he has. But there have been a few false starts so I’m waiting to see if these can be replicated. News of his injury, if true, is disheartening.

Campbell: Only had a few touches, overhit a couple of passes, just good to see him get his Arsenal debut.

Wenger: Still searching for his best eleven. Has clearly put faith in some of the younger players and his reputation could be at stake more than ever before because big players have been available and Arsenal have fewer financial restraints.


24 Responses to Everton 2 – 2 Arsenal: Match Thoughts And Individual Analysis

  1. dolgion1 says:

    Do you watch the matches multiple times? It’s difficult paying this much attention to all the different goings-on during the live viewing

  2. Humphrey says:

    I wonder how you come up with all this,brilliant piece though

  3. Humphrey says:

    And people saying alexis failed as astriker,wenger played alexis in a system adapted to big strong strikers.if u change personnel u have to change tactics play ozil much closer to him,try counterattacking football not the usual holdup,tick tuck that suits giroud

    • SomeRandomGunner says:

      No tactics will work if a player cannot pass to the teammate. Sanchez is completely out of sync with his teammates , this is fine since he has just played 2 matches with them in a new league.

      More worrying sign is that he is not able to make the pass he possibly sees, irrespective whether the teammate should be there or not. He played for Barca he has qualities to make right passes i am sure he will come around.

  4. Redcore says:

    Great analysis Desi. The analysis was fantastic even by your lofty standards. The detailed description of Szczesny’s errors was spot on, but I think that he deserves a bit more leeway from you considering that he is age..

    I just hope that Sanchez syncs with the team soon – that will give us a totally different dimension in attack. Until then I guess we are in for more of the same.

    Good luck to the boys against Besiktas 🙂

    • Busayo says:

      I wanted to say that too but then i remember GK that are about his age who make better decisions and often too.. De Gea, Courtouis, Ter Stegen, etc. WS needs to understand he has not arrived. I blv he needs big competition to keep him on his toes and i think Ospina will provide that when he’s fit

  5. Emmanuel says:

    It’s a delight to read your match analysis and it’s obvious that you closely watched the match to note that Ozil was by far the best Arsenal player on the day. In deed he was! I strongly believe that we’ll see the best of Ozil this season.

  6. Redcore says:

    Meant to say “I think that he deserves a bit more leeway from you considering his age..” in the previous comment!!

  7. ak gunner says:

    Fine thought but ozil is a gun powder waitin to explode.he expose d team in key areas just like d build up to d second gol.big teams r noticin dis tins.same wit cazorla.dey expose d teams in key areas and big team wil kip on exploitin it until wenger wiseup

  8. If u know so much why dont u apply for a managers post somewhere I am sure with your wealth of knowledge even more than one of the most respected managers around u will land a job pretty easily wont u

  9. 2012 says:

    Not that I am complaining, but did Giroud foul Distin in order to get that equalizer? Many photos show Giroud was clearly holding the defender down by the shirt.

  10. SomeRandomGunner says:

    Very fair report compared to the hyperbole circulating over other blogs. Everton hardly outplayed us. Ramsey was poor with his passes , Ozil was incisive .
    Sanchez was almost pointless he is on his own world compared to his teammates , As you have said Sanchez needs to simplify his game a lot and make the one-twos work. He is looking to make the runs which is a very good sign. He will surely get better.
    Giroud injury is very very bad news. We just need one out of sync player for our attacks to fail . We are going to miss Giroud even if we bring someone of his quality.

  11. 2012 says:

    I think Szczesny was initially rushing out to close down on Lukaku, who was played onside by Chambers, and who might have been Barry’s intended target. Instead the ball drifted over Lukaku and into the path of the on-rushing Coleman. It was probably equally bad to rush out toward Lukaku, however.

    Thanks as always for your analyses.

  12. SB says:

    Desi very insightful analyses. These days when I watch the game, I remember & hence notice, some of the points you have made repeatedly like ‘crowd defending’, which reduces our counter attacking capability.

    I also think we are very naive in playing the ‘dark side’ of game, which every other team seem to be better than us. Like the game against Besiktas, they seemed to have managed the fouls better, that we lost players both to injury & cards, while a team not as naive as us, would have probably reversed the outcome.

    • SB says:

      Missed mentioning, Desi would like your view on our ability to play the dark side of the game.

      • Charlie says:

        I can picture Steve Bould saying to Arsene “You do not understand the power of the Dark Side of the game”. Probably dressed in black with a helmet on his bald bonce. Anyway, i’m not being very helpful, excellent analysis as always Desi.

    • 2012 says:

      Giroud: “One day Wenger told me I’m too honest in my running, too predictable. I need to be more sly, tricky. I’m getting there.”

      Wenger’s version of the ‘dark side’?

  13. abachaghana says:

    what a joy it is reading from u, always learning new things from ur every article. My view is, sanchez is too despirate to prove his worth which, i think could thwart his confidence if he doesnt take it easy and just stick with his team mates for his moments to start coming. I felt AOC also had some moment that wud lead to couple of goals on another day despite his bad times u mentioned above. He was the only one that looked like he cud score in the 1st half. I love how chambers enjoys himself on the pitcH using the pitch for a beach fun which only helps his confidence and maturity.

  14. abachaghana says:

    debuchy’s attacking ability is being wasted because of very limited bodies in the box. some of the factors that worries me are:
    1. Our pressing is much annying when the opponents have the ball in their half, much like lower table team’s against a top team. watch the match again and see how sanches was puting preassure on the opponent and inviting his teamates to force an error. Thats what he does at barca they defend in the opposition half in numbers with great cohession.
    2. How we fail to get bodies in the opposition box when we are attacking. Just a dtriker in the box against chaw defenders will hardly work, that is why we rely only on passing and combination play for goal. When it fails, we struggle…… Thanks once again Desi for making supporting arsenal secuctive

  15. abachaghana says:

    Desi i remember u used to come in and have interaction in the comment forum and that was more educative. Why dont u come in once a while to have atleast some take ons on the comments to make us enjoy that good old days. You are my greatest blogger. Everything is here except bad…. Keep it up

  16. Right Cross says:

    Great analysis as usual Desi,

    The 4-1-4-1 is still not working with Wilshere and Ramsey. I wonder if Wenger will persist. Ramsey’s suspension for Besiktas will obviously see a change. Look forward to your thoughts on the best option.

    Flamini does need to take responsibility to move the ball. He is no Arteta but he can pass reasonably well and it would help the team get moving quicker if he worked harder in that area of his game. Seeing attacking players come far too deep to receive passes while Flamini actively avoids getting into position or waves off the defense to pass elsewhere is frustrating. He is getting better at holding more disciplined defensive positioning but still needs to work on that area of his game too and not get dragged all over the place chasing the ball like he has in the past.

    Was great to see Ozil back and watch his effortless class that created opportunities for others. Hopefully the other midfielders and attackers can improve their passing and movement and develop combination plays with him. Santi or Rosicky playing with him on Wednesday should see us find some attacking continuity and Sanchez will hopefully get opportunities.

  17. Top Gun says:

    Great analysis Desi. You really are a talented analyest

  18. ema says:

    good piece, desi. Probably, u v not noticed this well enough, u mentioned it partially though but i believe it should have more weight than it does. U mentioned wilshere, still not very ready to be in a title-challenging team, perhaps very true, plus the fact that his partnership with ramsey (arsenal’s most influential player) in the mid 3 is not just working!! Infact, it makes ramsey less efficient, because both are box to box midfielders, even if wilshere’s best role (attacking mid behind the 4-4-2 diamond formation) is no more feasible in modern football, it’s obvious that ramsey (his position though) understands and influences the game better from that position. So, playing wilshere and ramsey in d mid 3, wenger will expect wilshere to dictate attacking movements and moments, as well support in d primary def mid duties. Obviously push ramsey more advanced because he scores more, thereby making ramsey inefficient because playing more advanced, he plays in the face of the opposition. We v seen over time that ramsey thrives more in his work rate, having to run from behind where no once notices him to cause havoc (the way he ran in to tap in) as well as run back in case of emergency counter attack, which is not possible when he has to deal wiv 2 strong bullies in the opposition def mid monitoring his movements. And it is no coincidence that ramsey pops up each time wilshere is taken off, against palace and also at goodison
    conclusion: (1) ramsey is untouchable in that team, so should be 1st choice for the b2b role, jack to the bench (and should only play when ramsey is not playing).
    (2) wilshere should be tutored more on that role, he is the middleman of the middlemen, so he should stop trying too much seeing himself as the focal point man but as a ghost worker that should make things happen quietly and should only be seen on the camera for more than 3-4 secs when he scores or makes a ‘mad’ assist..
    Note: i am not blaming wilshere for arsenal’s poor display, but wenger that makes same blunder over again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s