Stoke City 1 – 1 Arsenal: Match Thoughts And Individual Analysis

We knew Arsenal will have to fight for the points in this one. They did respectably and came back with one. That point puts some daylight between the Gunners and Newcastle who lost against Wigan. There isn’t much in it but it’s clear virtually every team is having to battle for every single point. You take what you get and can be happy when you don’t give it all away.

The game itself was interesting, even if not enjoyable. After the exciting and high-quality Champions League semi-finals, watching such a fixture was bordering on torturous. There were certain predictable aspects but also a few positive changes from the Gunners.

Stoke came out and pressed high up the pitch as expected. They forced a mistake and scored with Crouch getting between the centre back and full back. Hardly a surprise there.

Normally, after scoring they tend to drop a little deeper and put greater emphasis on defending. In this game though, the hosts kept coming out even after going in front. That suited Arsenal as they were getting some joy every time they managed to bypass the initial high press. Pulis’ side looks like a strong defensive unit when they get bodies behind the ball but when they get stretched, the opponents can get chances to get into the box and test the Keeper.

In the first half Arsenal had a number of opportunities. Early on Van Persie played Benayoun through down the inside left channel. The Israeli couldn’t connect well enough and his strike, while on target, was completely innocuous. Van Persie then forced a big save from a header at the back post. Ramsey then went close with a left-footed strike from the edge of the box.

The equalizer came, ironically, from a long punt down the left by Vermaelen. Benayoun’s hassling was troubling Shotton and the Stoke full-back conceded possession tamely. The winger found Rosicky’s run. Little Mozart showed composure on the ball and excellent attacking intelligence. Before playing his cross he’d just had a peek. He saw the vacant space between the defenders and the Keeper at the back post. All he had to do was chip the ball in the right area. Van Persie was alert and tapped it home. Again Stoke were stretched so there were gaps in their box. Even thought Arsenal had only one player in there, he was completely free and able to guide the ball home without any pressure.

The patterns of play after the equalizer remained the same but Arsenal did get more control of the ball. They didn’t make many mistakes under pressure and limited the hosts to hopeful long balls and crosses.

In the 26th minute when Koscielny had the ball, Van Persie dropped deep and pulled a centre back with him. The centre back played the ball into the space behind and Gervinho was able to cut inside and onto that ball. Unfortunately, the Ivorian didn’t have the skill to hit the target when being chased by two defenders.

There were a number of other half-chances for Arsenal but they didn’t really find the final ball or the finish was disappointing.

The second half was a bit muted, relatively speaking. Arsenal still saw a lot more of the ball but the combinations were not as good. The number of shots were higher but the quality of chances was not.

There was an appeal for a penalty when Benayoun went down but it didn’t look like a foul to me, certainly not by the standards of this game. Indeed, Koscielny and Sagna also took their chances with pushing opponents in the Arsenal box so I don’t have too many complaints. That’s not to say the refereeing was good, just that it wasn’t very different from what we’ve come to expect at the Britannia.

Arsenal had a couple of free-kicks in good positions but the execution wasn’t very good. They also got the ball in and around the box quite often but either dilly-dallied on the ball or just picked the wrong pass.

At the other end I was impressed by the collective vigilance in defence. Apart from the goal Stoke only managed one shot on target that was easily saved. In total the hosts were limited to five or six shots.

The defending wasn’t perfect but the Gunners were quick to pounce on the loose/second ball. For instance, a couple of back passes could have put a striker through but one or the other defender got around to it first. Similarly, when Szczesny failed to get enough distance on some of his punches, a teammate bailed him out by getting to the ball before an opponent. This was a really pleasant positive change and everyone deserves credit for their effort as it wasn’t down to one or two players.

I also thought the vertical nature of the game, the end-to-end basketball style movements, took a lot out of the players and they ran out of steam in the second half. This made it relatively easier for Stoke in the second period but the Gunners ensured they didn’t give a soft goal away. And the hosts just didn’t have enough quality to create something on their own.

On the whole this wasn’t an elegant display but a battling one. That wasn’t surprising. The big question was how strong will Arsenal be in the battles. I’d say they weren’t dominating but held their ground firmly and respectably, often despite the referee.

Individual Performances:

Szczesny: Caught the ball well under pressure. Punches were weak. Interestingly, he’s 6/6 for clearances but that seems more due to his teammates’ ability to win the second ball rather than his ability to punch it clear. Sagna’s acrobatic clearance in injury time after Szczesny flapped at the ball is the perfect example.

Sagna: Made the mistake for the goal. Was uncharacteristically sloppy in possession. Put in a couple of excellent crosses but wasn’t very influential in attack. Not really tested at the back but did make that massive clearance towards the end. Was generally getting into very good positions when the balls came in from the other side.

Koscielny: Remained strong and vigilant at the back which meant he got into good positions and didn’t get physically dominated.

Vermaelen: Largely similar to Koscielny. Read the danger from balls coming towards the centre of the box and made a number of clearances. Did venture forward and won a free-kick but couldn’t really contribute to the attack.

Gibbs: Saw a lot of the ball and made decent use of it. Got into good attacking positions but either didn’t get the ball or he didn’t produce the final pass. Might have done better to attack the ball from which Crouch scored.

The defenders were on their toes and kept the goal well protected for most of the game. Sagna could have done better in possession while Vermaelen and Gibbs should have dealt with Crouch better but these kinds of things happen.

Song: Superb defensive shift. Noticeably curbed his instinct to bomb forward. Was trying to make things happen in the attack as well when he got a chance to venture forward. He did lose the ball quite often but also won it back just as regularly, including a game high 6 interceptions.

Rosicky: Classy assist, also created the other glorious chance that Arsenal had. Also made valuable defensive contributions in terms of winning the second ball and retaining possession under pressure. But he also wasted some promising opportunities. For instance, there was an audacious attempt to play an outside-of-the-foot ball over the defence towards RvP that went straight to the Keeper. He had time and space to turn the odds in his favour but went for a high risk pass and failed.

Ramsey: Even though he was on the pitch for only 73 minutes, Ramsey still attempted and completed the most passes. Also won all three of his tackles and wasn’t caught in possession as often as he’s been in the past. Spread the ball well and brought others into play, especially Gibbs. Work rate was again commendable. Did a respectable job of replacing Arteta in that sense. He can do better as he still took time to make some passes and ran with the ball more than he needed to. Had a couple of shots on goal but didn’t quite find the target.

The midfield played a vital role in supporting the defence. They had to go up and down the pitch more often than in most other games so the players deserve credit for sticking to the task. They didn’t have as much of a creative influence on the game but that’s a complicated issue which generally involves multiple players.

Gervinho: He had the movement and he was trying to get in behind. Even succeed in that on more than one occasion but his execution and decision making let him down when it mattered. Still had one or two bright moments but that isn’t enough. Was weak in the duels and was probably the only player who really struggled against the physical side of the game.

RvP: Took his goal well, hit the target with the other quality chance. Once again the work rate was exceptional and he often chased back if he’d lost the ball. Still has to develop the ability to hold his ground in front of the defender to receive the ball, seems like he’s always on the move and trying one trick or the other.

Benayoun: Harried and hassled Shotton into a couple of mistakes, one of which led to the equalizer. He’s another player who didn’t quite have enough when it mattered in and around the box. Deserves credit for effort and defensive shift.

The front three were more involved than in some of the games where Arsenal have struggled. The wide players interchanged their positions well and even popped into meaningful areas in the centre. But they lacked the ability to make a decisive contribution in the penalty box.

Subs: Diaby still looks rusty. Santos got very little time. Chamakh didn’t get any service in the box.

Wenger: At times in the past his players have been guilty of losing concentration at the back so he deserves credit for the focused defensive effort. Also prepared the players well for the physical battle and lenient refereeing.

DesiGunner on Facebook

20 Responses to Stoke City 1 – 1 Arsenal: Match Thoughts And Individual Analysis

  1. Maiko jm says:

    Arsene Wenger should go for physical players

    • santori says:

      Vermaelen, Diaby, Song, Sagna are not easy to push off the ball.

      Also Frimpong, Coquelin are fairly robust creatures.

      There is a rumour that he may be looking into MVilla (Rennes) but I can’t see that happening with the amount of midfield propsects coming through the academy. Aneke, Ozyakup

      Not to mention Arteta who has some bite to his game now.

  2. Rio says:

    Excellent Post Desi. I looked up the table after the results of yesterday and realized we are still in the driving seat for third even if Tiny Spurs win their both games but seriously are they capable of winning games nowadays?

    • santori says:

      And they have adding pressure to us.

      I don’t think we should be in a position to make ready made excuses for ourselves. Just because the other teams have had little success at the Britannia doesn’t mean we should expect such an outcome as remote success on our part.

      We will need to respond to NOrwhich and West brom as if they were spurs and Chelsea.

      It’s this sort of mentality which Arsene must breed into the team. NO need to be overly critical of them but his post match (public)response must be that we are still “not good enough”.

      that was, we will limit the complacency effect a little.

  3. […] Stoke City 1 – 1 Arsenal: Match Thoughts And Individual Analysis […]

  4. bigdennumber10 says:

    Taking a point at that bear pit wasn’t too bad considering Newcastle are the only team in the top nine to have taken 3 points there this season.

  5. aniruddh90 says:

    One win would seal the third spot now. we’re four clear of Newcastle with them having played one less and seven clear of Sp*rs who have two in hand. one win for us and one stumble each for the chasing pack should see us take third by a point

    • santori says:

      We need to win both games to be truly certain.

      I think we’ve (yet again) made it difficult for ourselves particularly with Wigan and QPR.

      Even this Stoke game was very winnable.

      Lots more to be done if we are to compete on 3 fronts effectively next season.

  6. JJ Pittman says:

    Great post, as always. We still control our own destiny! Win both games and no one can catch us for 3rd. I have a question: if Chel$ki do win CL, does 3rd place still automatically, or do we have to go through the qualifying stage like we did against Udinese this season? Does Chelsea then have to do that qualifier?
    Or do all 4 teams go straight to the final 32 in next years CL? Whoever finishes 4th will have to become huge Bayern fans for 6 days! Maybe it will be Chel$ki!

    • santori says:

      I’m a huge Bayern fan regardless.

      I want us to finish 3rd, Newcastle to snatch 4th, Chelsea to lose to Bayern, win the F All cup and finish 6th. Spurs can have the privelege of Europa, this is a ‘good season’ for them after all with their strongest ever squad in generations.:D

      • JJ Pittman says:

        So, do we have to qualify if we finish 3rd and Chel$ki win CL?
        Never too fond of Bayern M, because they have all the money, and used to play very defensively. However, have always liked Ribery and Robben and they play much more forwardly these days. Glad $hitty won today so they will play maximum against Barcodes next week, although I may change my mind if Chel$ki win Wednesday and we win early Saturday.
        Amazing how rooting interests change with it means to the Arse!

  7. Induct says:

    Spot on,are u a coach.I admire ur knowledge of football.With places like stoke mayb Arsenal needs players like M’Villa and Jan ,both of them.Jan in d case of injury to any of d defensive positions in our current squad.Diaby luks injured lata,hope am wrong coz we can’t afford such now.

    • santori says:

      I think the opportunity to move for a solid defensive midfielder will be only broached as per Diaby’s condition 9which still looks fragile).

      IF he cannot shake off the niggles, then he may be sold. I’m not sur eif MVilla is as complete a midfielder as Diaby is (particularly going forward) but he is certainly more robust.

      With the likes of Ozyakup (maybe Eisfeld) coming through,w e will certainly have enough options creatively in coming seasons (not to mention Jack)

  8. santori says:

    Thought the gaffer (again0 left it late to do a switcheroo with the squad.

    Benny put in an excellent shift and I would have preferred him on till the end.

    Gerviinho was flagging in the second half and Santos should have come on much earlier.

    Ramsey put in a decent shift considering the abuse he had but I’m still not convince with his confidence. The good thing is he is willing to play through the abd patch and put n effort.

    But (despite the ring rust) I thought we could have had Diaby on earlier provided we kept wingers wide.

    Not quite sure what the idea was with retaining only one winger and having Rosicky splayed out wide.

    Chamakh in was the right idea but then we handicapped oursleves immediately by withdrawing one wing and not electing to put crosses into him. Why?

    I’m a bit puzzled by Wenger’s tactics sometimes.

  9. santori says:

    Gervinho…is there somewhere he can learn to shoot properly?

    He gets into excellent positions and his movement was extremely useful yesterday but the shooting is simply appaling. Even an African goalmouth would not have been sufficient.

    Much as I think highly of our current set of wingers – Walcott, Gerv, Ox, (coming through – Gnabry, Ryo), I still believe we will do ourselves a massive disfavour if we do not elect to add one more player out wide (someone pref with craft and nuance)

    Podolski could help somewhat if he comes in as he can play ut left but I really think we lack someone who can hold the ball (a dribbling magician). If Diaby leaves, that technical ability will be further eroded.

    • WafflingWenger says:

      Agreed, but I don’t think Podolski is the answer to this puzzle. He’s, again, extremely direct.

      • JJ Pittman says:

        After watching Mancs today, have to like “direct”! Glad Nasri is gone. Clever doesn’t equal goals as he showed last year and today. I like Podolski a lot, hope he signs May 14!

  10. santori says:

    Desi I hope you don’t mind :

    Desi’s tactical analysis is one of the best I’ve seen but for another lucid take on our overall performance, I cannot recommend this blog more (and it is deserving of some support too)

    Excellent and balanced view. Taking nothing away from Desi’s of course.

    Please check it out and support.

  11. WafflingWenger says:

    “Still has to develop the ability to hold his ground in front of the defender to receive the ball, seems like he’s always on the move and trying one trick or the other.”

    And this is a criticism???

  12. Achilles says:

    Hi desi…..its too bad u hav time only for match previews and reviews these days…back then u touch other topics as concerns arsenal….i was expectin ur take on our new signing, lukas podolski.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s